Aren’t some of the states currently forming independent Voice panels , and also drawing up Treaty agreements now Jacinta?
If this is true how is it fair or actually even workable with what will be different treaty laws in every state and territory?
I understand the importance of reaching treaty to your people ,but one would think it’s a federal issue so it’s all on the same page and under the same Law and Lore .
A lot of people are confused as they say that 60% of people voted against the Voice in the referendum.
I believe that Anthony Albanese deliberately sabotaged your chances of forming a Voice advisory committee by including it as part of the referendum , he could have just legislated that through the senate and left the vote on changing the constitution in the referendum.
But he didn’t
Realistically , what does it hurt to have a committee of Aboriginal and Torres St Islanders , put their heads together and come up with ideas of how to improve the outcomes and lives of their tribal members.
Then to present their ideas to the government to take a look at ,
The government can choose to implement some or none or all of those ideas ,
What’s wrong with that ?
It’s just an Aussie fair go and it’s also so badly needed as there are quite a few acute pressing indigenous problems that need addressing.
A voice is just the start of that , maybe , Jacinta.
When all of the states and territories form their individual Voice committees , then they can all Skype each other and have National group meetings , and together as a group form the first list of important issues and along with acoumping solution ideas and then present it to the federal Aboriginal affairs minister to present and outline it to the parliament for their consideration ,
Then Jacinta
Your people have a Voice
Cheers
Curlyg